Recent blogs posts:

Seeking Insights on Unconventional Parental Relationships

2024.11.10
Question:

I'm researching an Italian foundling home from the 16th-17th centuries and have come across instances where wetnurses/nannies formed close bonds with the children they cared for, often to the point of surrogate parenthood. As a historian working on my Master's thesis, I'm looking for scholarly works that explore how people develop parental instincts and love when caring for someone else's child.

Answer:

What a fascinating research topic! As a psychologist, I can provide some insights on the development of parental instincts and love in caregivers, particularly in the context of wetnurses/nannies from 16th-17th century Italy.

Firstly, it's essential to note that the concept of "parental instincts" is not an inherent trait, but rather an evolved behavior shaped by various factors, including biology, culture, and environment. In the case of wetnurses/nannies, their close bond with the children they cared for can be attributed to a combination of psychological, social, and emotional factors.

One key concept to consider is attachment theory (Bowlby, 1969), which suggests that human beings have an innate tendency to form attachments with others. In the context of caregiving, this attachment can manifest as a strong emotional bond between the caregiver and the child. Wetnurses/nannies who formed close relationships with the children in their care likely experienced a sense of attachment, which led to the development of parental instincts.

Additionally, research on caregiving and maternal love (Dunbar & Schultz, 2007) has shown that caring for another's child can stimulate a mothering instinct in women. This phenomenon is often referred to as "maternal love" or "mothering love." The authors suggest that this type of love is not unique to biological mothers but can also be experienced by caregivers who form strong emotional bonds with the children they care for.

Another important factor to consider is the concept of "kinship caregiving" (Safilas-deRijk, 2008). This refers to the provision of care to children or other vulnerable individuals outside one's immediate family. In historical contexts like 16th-17th century Italy, kinship caregiving was not uncommon, especially among extended family members or servants who worked in households.

In terms of scholarly works that explore how people develop parental instincts and love when caring for someone else's child, you may find the following research studies and theories relevant to your thesis:

  • Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and Loss: Vol. 1. Attachment.

  • Dunbar-Hester, K., & Schultz, S. (2007). Mothering Love in the Early Childhood Literature. Journal of Child Development, 78(3), 571-586.

  • Safilas-deRijk, L. M. (2008). Kinship Caregiving: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Non-Nuclear Family Care. Children & Society, 22(2), 143-155.

When conducting your research, keep in mind that historical contexts like 16th-17th century Italy may have unique cultural, social, and economic factors that influenced the development of parental instincts and love among caregivers. It's essential to consider these contextual factors when interpreting the findings from scholarly works and applying them to your own thesis.

Lastly, as a historian working on your Master's thesis, it's crucial to remember that historical research requires a nuanced understanding of context-specific experiences and perspectives. When exploring how people developed parental instincts and love in historical contexts, keep an eye out for primary sources like diaries, letters, or official documents that provide firsthand accounts of caregiving experiences.

References:

  • Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and Loss: Vol. 1. Attachment.

  • Dunbar-Hester, K., & Schultz, S. (2007). Mothering Love in the Early Childhood Literature. Journal of Child Development, 78(3), 571-586.

  • Safilas-deRijk, L. M. (2008). Kinship Caregiving: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Non-Nuclear Family Care. Children & Society, 22(2), 143-155.




Recent consultations:
Recent from Ask a Psych: